Saturday, September 8, 2012

Week 3 discussion - Question 2

The books defines race as "the primary aspect of personal identity." It is what people classify a person as just by looking at him/her. I definitely do not believe it is a useful way of classifying people because race comes with many stereotypes that is not true for many people in that race. Race is also mistaken easily so it cannot be an accurate way to determine who people are. Some person will see an Asian person and automatically think she's Chinese, but in reality she's actually Vietnamese. That type of confusion is common among many people that it cannot be good to use it as a way to classify people. Also, race makes people bias. A more popular race, like Caucasian may be treated much better than someone who is African-American, Asian, or Indian. I also definitely believe that the Census Bureau should allow people to check multiple races because nowadays, more interracial relationships are going on, resulting into mixed children. These children should be able to identify both races that they are. However, even though they define themselves as a certain mixed race, they should still not be classified in that way because personality is still more important than the color of your skin, your heritage, or the family that you were born in.

1 comment:

  1. I found it really interesting that you brought in the concept of stereotypes and how even the word race can create a lot of stereotypical thought patterns. I honestly didn't even consider the racial slurs and negative stereotypes that get associated with them, but you definitely bring up a good point. By using that as a classification standard you allow for things like racial profiling, prejudice and so on to exist. Though, I don't know if eliminating the word race in terms of classifying humans would solve that issue, it definitely is a good point!

    ReplyDelete